http://orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/category/14.aspxService-OrientedRoy Ogbornen-US.Text Version 0.95.2004.102Roy Ogbornhttp://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/archive/2004/11/30/156.aspxTue, 30 Nov 2004 11:45:00 GMThttp://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/archive/2004/11/30/156.aspxhttp://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/comments/156.aspxhttp://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/archive/2004/11/30/156.aspx#Feedback2http://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/comments/commentRss/156.aspxhttp://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/services/trackbacks/156.aspxIs SOA something “new” that supersedes OO concepts (as some from MS and elsewhere are proclaiming), or is it that SOA forces us to throw away our OO concepts due to it’s limitations? Think about it, SOA can't possibly be, with the current state of technology, Object Oriented. If we want to use SOA (and it’s too compelling not to consider it), we’re forced into the limitation of data messaging and work requests only. OO is not part of SOA because of a technological or standards limitation. SO<img src ="http://Orbonyx.com/RoysBlog/aggbug/156.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />